10 Jan
2014
10 Jan
'14
2:34 p.m.
On Jan 10, 2014, at 5:20 AM, Oliver Kowalke
2014/1/10 Paul A. Bristow
And document the schedulers in a separate 'Implementation' section.
OK
May I suggest "library extension" or "customization" instead? I think it's important to allow user-supplied schedulers - e.g. the complaint about the containers used by the default scheduler implementation. Such users could, if desired, supply a scheduler with containers more to their liking. (I must admit I was a bit floored by the remark about "slower than threads," since that completely disregards the cost of preemptive kernel context switching.)