Re: [boost] [Hana] Formal review

Joel de Guzman writes:

[...]

Let me just make this clear: I am for Hanna's acceptance into boost. It is cool and well implemented. Many people will find a use for it. It's just not for me.

I'm fine with that, really. But just to be clear, would you use a TMP library that would be basically Hana core: - an efficient tuple implementation - optimized algorithms (filter, transform, for_each, nothing fancy) - no fancy FP concepts - a couple of header files, no more Would you use that, or would you still prefer to DIY? Regards, Louis