On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 2:50 AM John Maddock via Boost
Yes. Boost.Graph could do with a close look, in particular:
* There are pull requests for new features which need reviewing by someone competent in the field.
* The code base is rather ancient, and some careful modernization wouldn't go amiss.
Thanks -- that's a good one since there's also now a standards proposal
for graph which cites boost.graph as a primary implementation. I assume you have write permissions for the repo? http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p1709r2.pdf btw, one of the 'wander around' projects in my back pocket if I don't get suggestions is to cleanup warnings -- especially in boost.locale. Everytime I test a release candidate there are hundreds of them -- it's very annoying. Jeff