Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11

El 17/07/2017 a las 1:24, Peter Dimov via Boost escribió:

Joaquin M López Muñoz wrote:

...

1.7 mp_eval[_xx] functions should accept metafunctions in both their true and false branches.

I can't make this work. [...]

This is most unfortunate. My original concern remains though that there's no reason why one of the two branches of mp_eval_if should not accept a metafunction (and note the irony that mp_eval_if precisely does not eval when B holds). If syntax can't be made to work, it could be advisable to drop mp_eval_if altogether and provide for instance mp_apply_if: mp_apply_if,G,mp_list> Joaquín M López Muñoz