28 May
2015
28 May
'15
7:35 p.m.
El 28/05/2015 a las 18:18, John Maddock wrote:
On 28/05/2015 16:59, Peter Dimov wrote:
It looks to me that following the ?: specification would actually be easier to follow and more correct.
I sketched an implementation along those lines, which as a side effect defines the following useful traits:
Wonderful. Peter, John, thanks for this amazing simplification of TypeTraits.