Re: [boost] [review][beast] Review of Beast starts today : July 1 - July 10

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Peter Koch Larsen via Boost wrote:

My guess is that - as Niall pointed out - there is a large group of developers that could benefit from the parsing part alone,

They can use the parsing part alone today as well as the serializing part, with a dependence on . Examples of this usage are in the documentation. I believe the dependency on is the main point of contention (Niall, confirm?). I would like to have this discussion if possible since a resolution would satisfy everyone.

and probably also a group that would perform their own parsing and just use the transfer part.

This I have not heard of before, and is not a supported use-case. I don't think its particularly interesting to users.

Beast should be split into two libraries.

Beast is proposed as-is. Thanks