20 Apr
2013
20 Apr
'13
11:03 a.m.
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
We have ?: for scalars, you don't need to restrict yourself to a pure library
Overloading ?: would probably have to be a standalone language extension to core no?
Well, yes, it touches core, but there is a large difference between allowing one specific library type in ?: and letting users overload it as they please. Anyway, since standardization seems to be out, you can forget this comment. -- Marc Glisse