23 Mar
2024
23 Mar
'24
5:37 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 10:13 AM Richard Hodges via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Using the mailing list as a peanut gallery to punish innovation is distasteful and rude.
How do we determine whether there is innovation without discussion? It is very fair to ask what, precisely, is the innovation offered by this proposed library?
High quality submissions to boost are welcome.
And the responses to the request for endorsement, for which you have expressed a desire to see less of, are precisely aimed at determining whether or not the library in question is "high quality." There is a tendency to prefer writing new code to using what already exists. What makes this library better than others? Discussion is needed to determine this. Regards