On 17 May 2015 at 12:50, Ahmed Charles wrote:
This is my overall point, it seems. The administration of boost seems to be understaffed or overwhelmed or both.
Until that is fixed, I think Peter's assertion that people aren't being stopped, isn't true, since they can't effectively become part of the process.
I noticed at this year's C++ Now many more people were talking about employing a full time permanent dedicated Boost infrastructure engineer than previous years. I have no idea how that might work, let alone who would have the "right" kind of personality to make it work. Still, the cashflow is now there to achieve this, and that was always historically the main showstopper. One idea I think the SC should consider is a half time employment with irregular grant based top ups, so 18 guaranteed hours per week with extra hours paid per approved project specific grant. Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/