25 Feb
2015
25 Feb
'15
12:17 a.m.
On 24 Feb 2015 at 20:06, Bruno Dutra wrote:
Do you see anything so broken within MPL's design that justifies dropping backwards compatibility and redesign a new library from scratch? Is it really necessary, considering the existence of other modern options which already focus on an strict C++14 approach, such as Hana?
I'm curious: could Hana be wrapped with a MPL compatible shim API? As in, would that be a sane or insane idea? Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/