2016-10-27 20:41 GMT+03:00 Klemens Morgenstern
Am 27.10.2016 um 10:47 schrieb Johannes:
Hello,
following you can find my little review of the process library. Unfortunately, I have no more time to dive into more details of the library. But from what I have read and seen on the list I think that the library would be a good addition to boost. The author seems to be quite knowledgeable about the library domain and I think that he will bring it into the state that will be consensus after the review.
Thank you for your review. It was surely a mistake to only read the sources of the doc for errors, so I missed too many things; I'm really confused why so many links didn't work. I fear I cannot change the documentation during the review, but you're certainly right, it is a weak point. Nevertheless, I'll go through and address your points, so other reviewers might have some questions answered.
It is allowed to fix links/typos in the docs during review. Just make sure that: * the docs are always available * that sections do not change their names and addresses In that way people will get the fixed docs and links to sections will remain valid during the whole discussion. -- Best regards, Antony Polukhin