13 Apr
2019
13 Apr
'19
4:40 a.m.
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 00:47, Vinnie Falco via Boost
If I want/need a variant that offers the never-empty basic guarantee then Boost should not provide it?
Andrzej argues (in the other post) that you *shouldn't want* it, becoz it masks UB [result of programmer error] and will now cause havoc elsewhere in the program. Additionally he says he does not want to 'pay' for moving the bug elsewhere, as it's not worth paying for, and potentially [more] dangerous. degski -- *Microsoft, please kill Paint3D*