On 7/26/24 6:47 PM, Klemens Morgenstern via Boost wrote:
It's been over a month, shall we schedule the double-review with us both as review managers?\
I don't think that having two review managers is a good idea. Were we to disagree, it might lead to compromise which the current system avoids. I also have a personal relationship with Takatoshi which might cloud my judgement or might lead others to question my objectivity. That is, I trust your judgement more than our judgement. I CAN promise that if you take on the job of review manager of the two libraries, I will make a serious commitment to reviewing both - each in the context of the other. That is, I will do what I can to make your life as easy as I can. I hope others can do the same.
Alright let me state it more clearly: I will not be the review manager of redboltz/async_mqtt. I have not volunteered for that.
I committed to be the review manager for mireo and I opted to wait with scheduling their review as a courtesy for Takatoshi, so the timing isn't the deciding factor. I do however think that a very long delay becomes unfair towards the mireo team.
Unless we find a review manager for redboltz soo, I'd just stick to the official rules and schedule a regular review for mireo/async-mqtt5. They've been pretty much ready for review since late April.
A very understandable position. My concern was to avoid the possibility of having two similar and/or conflicting libraries which has happened before. How about relaying this discussion to the "Boost Review Wizard" who is the designated person for scheduling reviews. Robert Ramey
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost