15 Oct
2018
15 Oct
'18
2:16 p.m.
Hi all,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:21 PM Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost
I actually find it a convincing argument. Now I can see why you would want to have only `unique_value`.
Thanks a lot Andrzej! Given the positive feedback I got here a few months ago about this from several people, I decided to make this into a C++ standard proposal (I missed the previous mailing deadline) but I submitted it for this one (pre-San Diego): http://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1314r0.html Notwithstanding this, I am still up for implementing this separately to have it also in C++11 and up. I will probably keep an implementation in https://github.com/ojeda/unique_val, but also I don't mind putting another into Boost. Cheers, Miguel