2014-09-14 0:25 GMT+04:00 Robert Ramey
Antony Polukhin wrote
I'll take a closer look to the library and write a personal note with comments/notes as soon as I get some free time.
But first of all, I'll take care of the Compute review :-)
I'm wondering if perhaps you've got confused about the differing roles of review manager vs reviewer. IRC a review manager doesn't review libraries himself, he reviews the reviews of others, weighs them and arrives at a acceptance/rejection. Think the US court system
judge - review manager jury - reviewers.
I'm not going to write a full review of the library, I'm just trying to satisfy the first bullet for Review manager: http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html#Review_Manager In other words, there is a need to look through the sources, docs and build system, make sure that installation notes are sufficient, tell the author about missing/weak parts. For example: Compute library looks good, however its docs have no performance section. This is important, because in most cases users will use Compute library to speedup their code. If a lot of notes appear during such "preliminary investigation", then it's worth writing a review/comment to Boost Incubator. Compute library is not such case. -- Best regards, Antony Polukhin