For the record, Zach requested to mark the Text submission as withdrawn [1].
So, we currently are not looking for review manager.
[1] https://github.com/boostorg/website/commit/f1da3a92969d0e778b43c0a77ac16dffe...
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 01:05, Zach Laine via Boost
I've made all the recommended changes to Boost.Text that came up in the review. Glen, the previous review manager, recommended a mini review of Boost.Text once I'd made those changes.
If you'd like to manage the mini-review, please let me know.
For everyone, including potential reviewers and review managers, here are the major changes:
* All the specific review feedback issues have been addressed. * The string layer is now gone. * The text layer got a major re-work. It is now a set of template-based adaptors (basic_text<>, vs. a text typedef. etc.), which lets everyone get what they want. You can change the underlying storage type (including whatever allocator you prefer), select UTF-8 or UTF-16, and change the normalization form. Glen recommended I drop this layer, but the library is way less useful without this stuff, and these changes address all the concerns raised about the text layer in the review.
The updated docs can be found here:
https://tzlaine.github.io/text/doc/html/index.html
Oh yeah, and I added concept constraints to the whole library when you build in C++20 mode.
Zach
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net