9 Feb
2018
9 Feb
'18
1:58 p.m.
On 9 February 2018 at 07:36, Peter Dimov via Boost
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Isn't it time to require C++11 to avoid spending / wasting time on these
issues?
No.
Wouldn't it be worthwhile to discuss this point in a separate thread? It seems to me that, as C++11 support in 2018 :-) is starting to get ubiquitous, boost could be losing a lot of old cruft. A number of libs can then also be simply removed boost::array etc... Testing cycles would be quicker etc etc... degski