Re: [boost] Strange libstdc++ versions in travis-ci testers

2018-06-28 21:56 GMT+02:00 Stefan Seefeld via Boost :

On 2018-06-28 03:42 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:

2018-06-28 21:27 GMT+02:00 Stefan Seefeld via Boost

...

...

:

...

On 2018-06-28 03:14 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:

...

Maybe someone could help me understand the configuration on the travis-ci testers.

For avoidance of doubt: what exactly are you referring to by "the

Hi Everyone, travis-ci testers" ? Lots of Boost projects use their own CI configuration, so there is a huge variance on compilers and runtimes being used, some supporting C++11, some not.

This is interesting. I am referring to Boost.Opitonal tests on Travis configured here: https://travis-ci.org/boostorg/optional I am a maintainer of Boost.Optional, and I never configured these tests. They were not there a year ago, and at some point I started receiving test results from this site upon every commit. So I assume there must have been a Boost-wide initiative to put additional tests there. I assume that someone on the list might have taken part in configuring them, and may know the answers.

Startling... I'm maintaining a few Boost projects, too. And I would be most concerned if someone started to add stuff into "my" repos without first discussing it with me.

I do not see it this way. I get additional machines executing my tests for free. I can be but grateful. I just want to understand how they are configured, so that I can address these configurations in my library. Regards, &rzej;