HI Daniel. On Monday, 20. May 2013 10:48:20 Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
2013/5/20 Dave Abrahams
on Sat May 18 2013, Vladimir Prus
wrote: and at least Boost.Build should have its final layout.
I think maybe I disagree.
We definetly need to make some changes to the Boost.Build layout.
The question is, when to do them.
Currently, we direct both "tools/build" and "tools/jam" to the "build" repository, then we want that repository to be a submodule in boost at the location "build". Hence, the directory "tools/build/v2" will appear as "tools/build/build/v2" which is not the same layout as in SVN.
Yes, this is clearly not what we want. But where does "tools/jam" come from? It is not in the current svn layout anymore. Seems to be some v1 relict. Can you investigate this?
We could either use "tools/build" or "tools/build/v2" the root of repository "build". But we need to put the submodule at that exact location. Everything that is not matched (eg. jam/, index.html), can remain in the meta-repository "boost".
We wanted "tools/build" to contain the current "tools/build/v2" of svn. I wonder if we should do the final move after the transition to git. Or just move the files _now_ and adjust the toplevel scripts before the transition.
Which one do you prefer?
Nevertheless +1 for "tools/build" from my side if this works smoothly. The main culprit is that I don't even have a "tools/build" submodule at the moment. Yours, Jürgen -- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! * voice: ++49 4257 300 ! Fährstraße 1 * fax : ++49 4257 300 ! 31609 Balge/Sebbenhausen * jhunold@gmx.eu ! Germany