On 6/20/15 6:06 AM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
On 6/19/15 7:08 PM, Bjorn Reese wrote:
On 06/19/2015 06:35 AM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
"really quite short" is good enough if the cost is having to depend on a "32k header mega library" as David notes. Not to mention having to learn another library for me and for all future maintainers. So where
It seems to me that most of your general arguments against using Hana could be equally applied against using Spirit.
Yes! And that's exactly what I am doing with X3 :-) Minimizing dependencies.
Let me clarify, if that is too terse. I am *not* against using a TMP library. It's just that my preference now is for simpler libraries; as simple as possible, but still providing most (95+%) of the functionalities. That's what we are aiming for with X3. Less is more, simpler is better. Most of TMP usage can be distilled in a single header file (again referring to Eric's and Peter's works). If I can do the same with X3, that would be super! Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.ciere.com http://boost-spirit.com http://www.cycfi.com/