25 May
2017
25 May
'17
10:05 a.m.
Le 24/05/2017 à 22:44, Jonathan Müller via Boost a écrit :
What about providing no default constructor? There are two valid choices so why surprise half the users?
Yes, it makes it a bit harder to use in arrays, but how often would it need to be stored in arrays anyways.
I need a default constructor even if uninitialized. What do you think an uninitialized default constructor? Vicente