Re: [boost] Two mqtt libraries

On 7/26/24 8:55 AM, Klemens Morgenstern via Boost wrote:

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 3:10 AM Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:

...

On 5/22/24 3:14 AM, Georg Gast via Boost wrote:

...

Hi,

Regarding the overlap: I don't think it would be a problem. This is already in boost. Statemachine and MSM. Serialization and JSON.

Statemachine and MSM both serve the exact same purpose.

Actually, that is the iconic example of the situation I'd prefer to avoid.

It's been over a month, shall we schedule the double-review with us both as review managers?\

I don't think that having two review managers is a good idea. Were we to disagree, it might lead to compromise which the current system avoids. I also have a personal relationship with Takatoshi which might cloud my judgement or might lead others to question my objectivity. That is, I trust your judgement more than our judgement. I CAN promise that if you take on the job of review manager of the two libraries, I will make a serious commitment to reviewing both - each in the context of the other. That is, I will do what I can to make your life as easy as I can. I hope others can do the same. Robert Ramey