On 24 Sep 2013 at 18:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+1 on that. I've had a very good experience so far with the LLVM bug tracker as compared to the GCC bug tracker. Where on GCC's tracker you really need to prove a bug is incontravertibly true for it to not get autoclosed,
That's clearly not true, based just on the number of open UNCONFIRMED bugs in GCC's bugzilla! We can be pretty militant about seting bugs to WAITING if the report doesn't provide enough information, but I dispute that bugs are "autoclosed" without good reason.
Fair enough, my experience with GCC's issue tracker is approaching a decade old. No offense intended, and glad to know bug reports are welcomed. Niall -- Currently unemployed and looking for work. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/