1 Mar
2019
1 Mar
'19
8:35 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:14 AM Niall Douglas via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I find that situation daft. And it was completely avoidable.
For me, a HUGE tick in favour of variant2 is that it has the design which std::variant should have had from the beginning, at little build time nor runtime cost over std::variant.
I will therefore be strongly recommending the use of variant2 instead of std::variant wherever possible. Until WG21 clean up that mess, which I hope variant2 will help persuade them to do.
+1 Or not, and that'd be one more step towards Boost being better than the standard library. It's a trend. :)