On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 9:48:53 AM AEDT Gavin Lambert via Boost wrote:
On 17/12/2019 02:42, Arthur Gruzauskas wrote:
ACCEPT, simply because I am using it happily.
but I have only used container_interface, not the rest.
Oops, should be 'I have only used iterator_interface' BTW, I know my review was simplistic, and only covered a small portion of the proposed library. I just did it to nag you more experienced folk into shrugging off very understandable review fatigue.
Point of confusion; later you said:
So far brief tests have all worked well. I did not exhaustively test the iterators. They also worked fine in a couple STL algorithms. Again, I have only dealt with iterator_interface.hpp
[...]
BTW, I have not used container_interface, I just saw it now and had a look. I can see this simplifying some upcoming containers, and will certainly be giving it a go.
Which is it?