Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Ahmed Charles wrote:

...

On May 11, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:

Hello,

I realize that Boost has Signals library already, but I've implemented a non-intrusive one which approaches the problem differently, and I'm pretty sure that there is no overlap between the two. It turned out more generic than I originally anticipated, so I thought I'd ask if others would find it useful as well.

Specifically I was motivated by wanting to use Qt without MOCing. I asked the Qt community if that was possible which generated several rather annoyed negative responses.

Have you looked at CopperSpice? It's basically Qt 4.8 but in C++11 and without MOC.

Perhaps I shouldn't have emphasized that Synapse makes it possible to add custom Qt signals without mocing and without having to derive from their types. Synapse is not about Qt, it's much more generic. -- Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode