I would suggest that any boost project should have MORE THAN ONE project owner. - So we would have more developers with write access to the projects - Pull requests with features/bugfixes could be merged - No stagnation in projects (or less projects than now) - No need for so many projects to become CMT. There would be "fallback" project owners. - There would be need for code reviews. Yes, for the code of project owners too! They should make regular merge requests to the other project owners. - In formal code reviews: not one developer against all others, but a team represents the project Mike... Am 02.11.2017 um 17:37 schrieb Edward Diener via Boost:
The following libraries still have PRs, which I have previously submitted, for removing the executable attribute for one or more files:
foreach polygon xpressive bimap ptr_container gil assign typeof msm
None of these PRs affect anything other than the file attribute, so no testing is needed AFAICS since no code changes. If the maintainers of the above libraries, or someone else with write access to these libraries, can merge the appropriate PR to 'develop', and then merge 'develop' to 'master', we can get rid of having any files with their executable attribute set in the next release.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost