24 Aug
2020
24 Aug
'20
5:32 p.m.
On 2020-08-24 20:22, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
- It does *not* require the license to appear in the compiled binaries, which may contain the data in binary form.
It does. Without explicit permission (which the BSL contains for this very reason), binaries are derived works as much as script-processed files are.
I thought "copies" means copies of the source code, doesn't it? There is also a latch that the license can appear only in the docs, not the data itself, whether in source or binary form. I guess, that's what the layer has to clarify. But if it indeed means binary form as well then, alas, no Unicode in Boost.