Re: [boost] Boost.DLL formal review is ongoing

Before I give my review, I would like to first ask some open questions here and see if I understood some points correctly. * Is Mac OS totally unsupported? * When would support for it be possible? As an avid Mac OS user, I feel excluded. Don't know if this is an issue for anybody else, though. * Why is the default section named "boostdll"? * Why not use the platform default? * Can't the "on_unload" have a similar API in the library? Thank you, Rodrigo Madera