Re: [boost] Is there a design reason why beast static_string uses size_t for length?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 3:32 AM Glen Fernandes wrote:

Note that boost::static_string (Boost.StaticString) does not always use size_t:

https://github.com/boostorg/static_string/blob/develop/include/boost/static_... Maybe boost::beast::static_string can become an alias to boost::static_string.

Weird. :) I would have expected them to be the same, I guess you did the fix I wanted but it was never backported(IIRC static_string was take out of beast to become standalone, but could be wrong). In any case my problem is solved, but if Vinnie sees this I would be interested to know if difference is intentional or not.