On 11/16/2018 7:20 AM, Tom Kent via Boost wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 12:05 AM degski via Boost
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 20:48, Marshall Clow
wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:12 PM degski
wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 00:50, Marshall Clow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
The release candidates for the second 1.69.0 beta release are now available at:
https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.69.0.beta1.rc2/source/
The release notes are not yet final.
The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
77827b25121159a4e65cfbdf19713e2d589fce267fd6f08615a453d24753c9d3 ./boost_1_69_0_b1_rc2.7z ea05c6e01c856369afdab1f6c075e06fb0f965ab1c247f753ed5c951a9db4e71 ./boost_1_69_0_b1_rc2.tar.bz2 b393a73cf084be716c40ef346cfacb1c95e7b14637e8385eeeb50774dd0b99ed ./boost_1_69_0_b1_rc2.tar.gz 74c0c0a19a700fee2b4f434bb7df50840642e3c35924e85864b278bd519af062 ./boost_1_69_0_b1_rc2.zip
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
I have tried to build with VC-15.9 (yesterday's update) and I hit the following:
don't know how to make
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual
Studio\2017\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.16.27023\bin\Hostx64\vcvarsall.bat
...skipped pc:\boost-build\boost\bin.v2\standalone\msvc\msvc-15.9msvc-setup.read for lack of
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual
Studio\2017\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.16.27023\bin\Hostx64\vcvarsall.bat...
common.mkdir c:\boost-build\boost
after which everything fails of course, which is unsurprising as vcvarsall.bat is now located at "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Community\VC\Auxiliary\Build\vcvarsall.bat"
I don't know why, how or what, but that's what I see. b2 builds, but that's because I'm building from a dev-prompt.
Short answer - I don't care about this for the beta. (since the MSVC update happened yesterday), but it ought to be fixed for the 1.69.0 release.
I understand [that you don't care about something that happened the day before]. Would indeed be nice to have it fixed, 15.9 is quite an update and from what I understood from STL on reddit, the base for VC-16 (VS2019).
I was able to build with 15.9 without any issues. See the end of the log here: https://gist.github.com/teeks99/b59b073cdf08f08d5fd6d170721c92ca
That was an upgrade from 15.8, on a machine with other versions of VS....could either of those things be mitigating factors?
I am thinking probably not. The file and directory locations for the Visual Studio 2017 versions (e.g. compiler 14.1) are totally different than the older releases. So all here know, there is already an update to the Visual Studio 15.9.0 to 15.9.1. The size of the update is on the order of 4 GB. I have no idea what makes it so large. The official release notes are not giving a whole lot of guidance for the download size increase. Also, after applying the 15.9.1 in the last ten minutes, I have to restart my computer. Almost all previous Visual Studio updates do not require this. Sincerely, Robert
Tom
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost