Re: [boost] Once accepted, when does a library undergo further review?

"Paul A. Bristow" writes:

...

-----Original Message----- From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Edward Diener Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 7:10 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Once accepted, when does a library undergo further review?

On 1/3/2014 11:56 PM, Richard wrote:

...

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]

boost@lists.boost.org spake the secret code thusly:

...

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Richard wrote:

...

However, once a library has been accepted, it doesn't seem to go through any more peer review.

In other words, once a library has been accepted into Boost, what prevents that library from suffering from "code rot"?

Can I suggest that Boost.Test be placed in 'community care'?

+1. Some weeks ago I was arguing that Boost shouldn't treat maintainer status as a binary. Some important libraries have maintainers who are just-not-quite-absent. Alex -- Swish - Easy SFTP for Windows Explorer (http://www.swish-sftp.org)