Re: [boost] Coroutine2 examples - Cannot link properly.

On 3/31/2016 6:09 PM, Carlos Ferreira wrote:

None of them seem to be defined. I have checked one by one using the header files included in the fibonacci example and none of those macros seem to be defined.

Is there a test or a "boost" way for me to confirm and to be sure that none of those macros are defined?

Just a C++ way <g>. Add to an included header file: #include #if defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_AUTO_DECLARATIONS) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_CONSTEXPR) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_FINAL) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_TUPLE) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_NOEXCEPT) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_NULLPTR) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_TEMPLATE_ALIASES) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_UNIFIED_INITIALISATION_SYNTAX) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_HDR_ATOMIC) || \ defined(BOOST_NO_HDR_TUPLE) #error Your message here #endif

On 31 March 2016 at 22:20, Oliver Kowalke wrote:

...

if one of the defect macros below seams to be defined - prevents including execution_context:

BOOST_NO_CXX11_AUTO_DECLARATIONS BOOST_NO_CXX11_CONSTEXPR BOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS BOOST_NO_CXX11_FINAL BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_TUPLE BOOST_NO_CXX11_NOEXCEPT BOOST_NO_CXX11_NULLPTR BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES BOOST_NO_CXX11_TEMPLATE_ALIASES BOOST_NO_CXX11_UNIFIED_INITIALISATION_SYNTAX BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES BOOST_NO_HDR_ATOMIC BOOST_NO_HDR_TUPLE

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost