Le 05/03/14 18:49, Niall Douglas a écrit :
On 5 Mar 2014 at 13:54, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
I think that you must define your own monad state that could be seen as any other monad using the functional/monads framework. Once your Boost.Functional/Monads framework is available, more than happy to do so. I hate writing and particularly maintaining boilerplate.
Thoughts regarding the design much appreciated! My thanks in advance.
I will inspect your code in order to see if I've understood your needs as soon as I have enough time.
Hi,
I have not taken the time to inspect your code. However I have started
my POC of the Boost.Functional/Monads framework in [1].
I have just configured boost::expected