10 Oct
2013
10 Oct
'13
11:09 a.m.
On 10.10.2013 12:21, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I understand there's been some discussion about dropping support for compliers with BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION defined. Has some final decision been made about this? What is the question behind the question? Once the decision is taken, I can get rid of some workarounds in the Boost libs I maintain.
Indeed. I already have patches ready to push which remove the use of the macro throughout boost. I think it is reasonable to push them in several days after releasing 1.55 (providing there is no significant negative feedback).
-- Sergey Cheban