Re: [boost] [testing] Need optimization help!!!

On 2/1/17 9:23 AM, Rene Rivera wrote:

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Robert Ramey wrote:

The 40 minutes includes *only* generating the reports that we see on the web site. By this point all the tests have run. Key though is that this is generation for *all* the tests for *all* libraries times all the testers on both master and develop branches. So we are talking about a large amount of data to process and generate.

OK - that's helpful. I use Library Status to generate tests for all the combinations I test, release, debug, static, shared, debug, release for a couple of compilers. The report generation phase is not nothing, but it's insignificant next to building and running the tests themselves. So it's ever been a problem. Of course I have no idea if it similar or different in speed to the official boost one. My motivation for creating library_status from Baeman's original program was to be able to compare results across compilers and across configurations which is very helpful to me in finding the cause of problems in my library. So it clearly identifies build features such as release vs debug, static vs shared, compiler vs compiler. etc. And it doesn't truncate the error messages - which has caused me no end to frustration on trying to use the boost report. Robert Ramey