13 Dec
2013
13 Dec
'13
12:12 a.m.
On 12/12/2013 9:35 AM, Matt Calabrese wrote:
A little hackish, but:
template< class T, int = 0, class S > boost::optional<T> lexical_cast( S const&, std::nothrow_t ); Is that even legal?! A non-defaulted template parameter after a defaulted one? <boggle> How will this fare on older compilers, I wonder. -- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org