Sorry, yes that's true, I mean C++03. On 5/5/16 12:35 PM, Jason Rhinelander wrote:
On 05/05/16 11:39 AM, Hans Dembinski wrote:
... without sacrificing C++0x compatibility, ... ^^^^^
Support for C++0x is essential ... ^^^^^
This project contains an easy-to-use powerful n-dimensional histogram class implemented in C++0x ^^^^^
Your usage here of "C++0x", both in your documentation and your replies in this thread, appears to be contradicting what you mean: C++0x was the informal name for what eventually became C++11 (see http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html). But what you seem to mean (judging from the context of your replies) is C++03, not C++11.
Jason Rhinelander
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost