Re: [boost] [contract] help marking regression test expected failures

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost wrote:

El 25/10/2017 a las 16:56, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribió:

...

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:

...

On 10/25/2017 3:09 AM, Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost wrote:

...

El 25/10/2017 a las 1:16, Lorenzo Caminiti via Boost escribió:

...

https://github.com/boostorg/boost/blob/develop/status/explicit-failures-mark...

Doesn't math the expected failures I see on the regression report: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/contract.html

Your changes haven been added to develop but not merged to the release version of explicit-failures-markup.xml yet.

Why would not an explicit-failures-markup.xml for 'develop' be applied to 'develop' regression testing ?

Correct. I am only looking at develop regression testing so the fact that explicit-failures-markup.xml is not merged to master/release is not the problem.

I *think* the xml version from master is used regardless of whether the reports corresponds to develop or master.

You are right! I just checked and the expected failures showing up on develop regression test report match 100% the markups of explicit-failures-markup.xml from *master* (instead of using the markups from develop). Who can fix this? Making sure that explicit-failures-markup.xml from develop (not master) is used to markup the develop's regression tests. Thank you. --Lorenzo