Am So., 28. Nov. 2021 um 18:18 Uhr schrieb Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org>:
On 11/28/21 19:53, Richard Hodges via Boost wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 17:34, Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 11/28/21 16:27, Oliver Kowalke via Boost wrote:
Is Boost.Spawn intended to be useful on its own, or is it only usable
in
Boost.ASIO?
It can only be used with boost .asio (or with the forthcoming C++ std::io_context). The lib is intended to replace the boost::asio:::spawn().
In this case why should it be a separate library and not just part of Boost.ASIO? What would be the value for Boost users or other Boost libraries?
Getting code into Asio would require Chris Kohlhoff's buy-in.
Using this library in Boost.ASIO also requires Chris' cooperation, doesn't it?
no response to email
And if this library is not useful outside Boost.ASIO and Chris is not interested, I just don't see the point.
Don't get it ... 'not useful outside boost.asio' ... You can create asynchronous code that looks synchronous on behalf of boost::asio::io_context or the forthcoming C++ std::io_context.