14 Jul
2014
14 Jul
'14
4:12 a.m.
Thanks for the link. I'll certainly have a look... Uhm, it's in Nov. and for C++ standard committee. So, it's in far perspective... and the industry I am in is always a few years behind the Standard. :-( Would not that be possible/sensible to address that in Boost for the time being?
Last I spoke to Eric, he had no plans to propose his library (which, by the way, can be found here [1]) to Boost, but that doesn't mean someone else who's willing to do the work couldn't. I'm curious what Neil thinks of this library as a possible future direction for Boost.Range. Regards, Nate [1] https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3