Re: [boost] boost.spawn: review requested

On 11/29/21 17:54, Boris Kolpackov via Boost wrote:

Oliver Kowalke via Boost writes:

...

I'd like to propose the new library boost.spawn [...]

FWIW (and I may be out of context), but "spawn" seems like a too generic of a name. I, for example, thought this is about posix_spawn(). Maybe call it spawn_fiber or some such?

+1