On 22 March 2017 at 03:00, Peter Dimov via Boost
I'm more interested in our original topic, that is, there to be a way to validate a .qbk file such that (a) the warning for a missing [endsect] to be an error (and the same applies to other similar warnings, if there are any)
I'm working on it: https://github.com/danieljames/quickbook/commit/68f11c3854b69173f321332f2cfa...
and (b) unmatched [section]/[endsect] in an included .qbk to also be treated the same way if the .qbk marked as self-contained in some unspecified way (not sure that a docinfo block is the best way to mark for our purposes, although I'm not exactly an expert.)
Less of a priority. It's been years since I implemented that warning, and this is the first time that's come up.