3 Jun
2015
3 Jun
'15
5:23 a.m.
This whole thread illustrates one of the problems that the Boost Library Incubator was intended to solve. If a few reviews of the library had been submitted to the incubator, (or even comments) then there would bave been time to address the situation in a convenient way. As it stands, now we have a long discussion about whether the library should be changed during the review, whether it should be re-reviewed and what the review policy is and what precedents, etc., etc. ... The author has certainly demonstrated that he's interested in responding t comments and suggestions right away. Just think how much better this process would have been if some of the comments/reviews had been submitted a couple of weeks ago. Robert Ramey