24 Nov
2014
24 Nov
'14
5:49 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Matt Calabrese
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba < vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
I will ad that I believe Dr BS don't like dynamic visitation, but here we are doing pattern matching on types, isn't it?
For a while I assumed exactly that, but he actually specifically voiced that he does not like visitation on variant and thinks of it as a hack. It's sad :/
He presented an interesting switch-like matching (both values and types) mechanism at the last standards committee. But until we get it, we need *something*. Tony