On 7/9/2014 11:54 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:
On 07/09/2014 01:43 AM, Daniel James wrote:
On 9 July 2014 07:04, Eric Niebler
wrote: On 07/07/2014 05:30 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
Eric Niebler has issued a couple of pull requests for MPL on 'develop' involving VC++ and the has_xxx functionality which I have merged to 'develop' after testing them locally and successfully with various versions of VC++ from VC8 to VC12. The earlier already cycled through regression tests successfully but the latest was merged just recently. The latest involves a change for the NVidia CUDA compiler, for which I see no regression testing. I have not tested this change with the CUDA compiler ( is there even a Boost Build toolset for this compiler ? ) but I implictly trust Eric's judgment.
Can/should these changes be merged to 'master' for 1.56 ?
Well, I'm a release manager, and I think it's ok. I admit I'm biased and should probably recuse myself. Maybe one of the other release managers could chime in?
Is CUDA emulating Visual C++? If it is, then you should use _MSC_VER rather than BOOST_MSVC, otherwise it will break again if config ever gets CUDA support. Do you know if it works with CUDA on other platforms?
Honestly, I don't know how the CUDA compiler works. I know it *does* work with CUDA on Linux with gcc. I also know this change was needed on Windows.
I had not merged your first change from 'develop' to 'master' and I am sure that is correct, since I tested it with VC++. I have VC8 through the latest VC12 I test against. Were you able to test your second change and how did you do it, since there is no toolset for CUDA AFAICS ? I assume you figured out a command line to pass to the CUDA compiler if you tested it. If it is alright to merge these changes to 'master' should I tell Marshall Clow after it has been done ?