On 2 Sep 2014 at 13:10, Glen Fernandes wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Robert Ramey wrote:
What do you mean by "ready for review" exactly?
While the thread subject [now] confuses me also: Was the motivation for the thread to find someone who is interested in improving this concurrent_unordered_map implementation such that it would be accepted into some Boost library?
A number of people on this list were interested in knowing when I felt concurrent_unordered_map was ready for production use, and the algorithmic design I finally settled upon which is quite a mongrel. Posting here was the easiest way of doing that, and I am working with a number of people off-list who emailed me privately after the announcement. I also welcome comments on its algorithm and its choices of design tradeoffs here, as it is unconventional. I have no intention of submitting it for inclusion into the Boost libraries. A GSoC student can do that next year, he/she would benefit far more from the experience than I. Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/