9 Jul
2017
9 Jul
'17
3:01 p.m.
On 07/08/2017 10:39 PM, Phil Bouchard via Boost wrote:
That is flawless... If anybody is willing to fool this memory manager then please go ahead!
Actually I think I'll still need to fine tune-it but I'm getting there. Also it'll be better if I reintegrate the old "inclusive" mode (in the master branch) and the user can choose the mode at run-time or compile-time. Thanks, -Phil