Re: [boost] [atomic] Bikeshedding over address-free waiting/notifying operation names

On 2020-06-01 13:50, degski wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 16:05, Andrey Semashev via Boost mailto:boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

The "address-free" term comes from the C++ standard, but the resulting names seem a bit long. Maybe there are better suggestions?

What about "global_"-prefix or "_system"-post-fix ("_sys")?

Hmm, that doesn't quite communicate the difference from the default operations.