Isn't it time to require C++11 to avoid spending / wasting time on these issues?
+1 Upgrading one’s compiler to adopt the current standard is free and riskless. In the same way that someone building a modern army would not choose to equip his soldiers with swords and pikes, no sane project leader would choose to use c++03 in favour of c++17 today. New libraries should not pander to obsolete coding practices at all. People must simply keep up, otherwise we’re all stuck in the dark ages.
On 9 Feb 2018, at 09:13, Olaf van der Spek via Boost
wrote: On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost
wrote: * is there any better option? All the other options I see are even worse.
Isn't it time to require C++11 to avoid spending / wasting time on these issues?
-- Olaf
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost